On 2/7/08 9:18 AM, "M Gagnon" <auria.mg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Packaging it is currently very painful. The current X11 package uses a > launcher. We could still use a launcher for the native version and have it > easy, but it doesn't feel right, and there's up to 3 icons in the dock for > GIMP (while usually a dock should only have one icon per app. in this case, > it's one for the launcher, one for GIMP, one for script-fu). So the procedure > I have written about some time ago does work just fine without launcher, but > has only minimal functionnality, I'm not sure I understand fully your packaging mechanism, but would it be possible to have script-fu and the launcher as faceless background apps? I know it's possible to disable the dock presence (for a given app) -- but I am not sure if it's really needed a UI for the extra 2 processes in your new scheme. If I understand the intentions of the project (make GIMP a seamless first-class citizen on OS X), in theory the user shouldn't need to worry about those technical details: so I'm thinking, maybe any config-related UI elements could be removed or moved somewhere else and have the 2 additional processes as background daemons. Ettore _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
