Hi, On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 03:32 +0000, William Skaggs wrote: > Okay, I can see that a preview would go a long way toward > making the dialog more usable. I looked over the relevant code, > though, and I'm not sure it would be very easy to set one > up. Previewing libart stroking wouldn't be very hard, because > basically all you need is a set of tiles to do the stroking on. > Previewing paint tool stroking would be more problematic: > it requires either an attached drawable, or massive code > changes. So, as far as I can see, the only way to do it without > massive rewriting would be to create a new temporary layer, > attach it to the image, render the preview onto it, transfer > the preview to the dialog, then remove the temporary layer. > That wouldn't be hard to do, but it seems a bit, um, baroque. It's not only baroque, it is definitely not a reasonable way to implement this. The Stroke dialog must not alter the image structure. Simply because there is no guarantee that the user (or some plug-in) doesn't do anything else with the image while the dialog is opened. I don't see though why it requires massive changes to implement a preview of paint strokes. It should be possible to do this after some refactoring of the code. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
