Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:08 -0500, Christopher Curtis wrote: > If this change is implemented in GEGL, does that mean it will make it > into 2.6? Probably not as it seems rather unlikely that we will start to use GEGL for the layer modes in 2.6 already. > If not, wouldn't it make more sense to allow Jesper to improve 2.6, > then port it to GEGL (and remove the non-CMS aware version)? We don't want the core to depend on lcms. Also there are some other problems here, such as that we can not change a layer mode as that would break backwards compatibility. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
