On Nov 26, 2007 1:58 AM, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2007-11-25 at 18:52 -0600, Chris Mohler wrote: > > On Nov 22, 2007 1:03 AM, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This is a nice start, but I think we need a lot more information in the > > > short description. So one row per task is certainly not going to be > > > sufficient. But it's probably a good idea to finalize the structure and > > > layout before we go into filling in all the details. > > > > I trolled through Bugzilla and added anything with a 2.6 milestone. I > > *think* this is now a list of all possible tasks for 2.6. > > Eeek, no! I thought I had tried to make the purpose of this list clear. > We already have Bugzilla and its milestones for the purpose of reminding > us what needs to be done for 2.6. The task list is supposed to list a > few tasks that we consider important and that show where GIMP > development is heading. Your list now has about five times too many > items. It will be rather difficult to get to the final list from there. OK - I thought it was too long also. Ignore the third version. I'm beginning to see the light - we need a short list of the most important items, with a nice description for each... I'll try again tonight. Chris _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
