Hi Jespar, On Nov 20, 2007 9:23 PM, Jesper de Jong <jespdj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I noticed that with Gaussian blur, the Radius setting in GIMP means > something different than in Photoshop CS3. > > As a test, I made a black square on a white background and used Gaussian > blur on it with Photoshop CS3 and the current development version of GIMP > with radius 6.0 pixels. Photoshop blurs the image much more heavily than > GIMP; to get the same effect with GIMP, I had to set the radius to > approximately 19.0 pixels. Have you checked that the radius is in pixels in BOTH cases, and not in inches or points? > > Is Gaussian blur not a standard algorithm that has a well-defined meaning > for the radius? See for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_blur > > If it is, then which one is doing it wrong, CS3 or GIMP? _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
