On 8/23/07, David Marrs <David.Marrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Amit Kumar Saha wrote: > > Am i thinking in a way that could possibly be implemented? or is the > > word "extensible" remotely applicable to my idea? > > > So what you're talking about here is a graphical interface to the API that a > user can use to build his own extensions? Essentially, it's a graphical > programming language. There are quite a few examples of these in the music world > that allow the construction of modular synths (amongst other things). > > It sounds to me more like a separate companion program that's used to construct > plug-ins than a plug-in itself. I like the idea very much. In some ways, this is essentially what /meta operations/ in GEGL is about, at the moment they are written in C, but they could just as well be created with an XML syntax and edited in a graph based environment. See GEGL (http://www.gegl.org/) and bug #465743. /Øyvind K. -- «The future is already here. It's just not very evenly distributed» -- William Gibson http://pippin.gimp.org/ http://ffii.org/ _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
