Hi, On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 14:43 -0600, D. Stimits wrote: > For me, it is a serious problem. I work in the print industry, typically > creating PostScript drivers. The PS output is quite good quality, and > every conversion generally suffers serious quality issues. Gimp is one > of the best tools available for UNIX side PostScript. Photoshop and some > other tools, despite being Adobe products, tend to break standards > compliant high end print systems (most of those products work great so > long as you don't mix them with other people's products, then they > suck...gimp PS works flawlessly with all of the certified systems). As > soon as you start making PDF-to-PostScript conversions or > PostScript-to-PDF-to-PostScript, the output is hopeless. Don't do it. We are talking about the new Print plug-in here, not about the plug-in that is used to save an image as a Postscript file. So your concerns are probably not valid. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
