Thanks for the reply, Kevin. > While using the foreign function interface of TinyScheme might work, for what > you are trying to do it is not the best approach. You should really look at > implementing it as a TinyScheme extension. Take a look at the re and tsx > extensions for TinyScheme to see how extensions work. Thanks for mentioning this; we hadn't looked at it previously. Making an extension is definitely what we'd like to do once our code is in a state worth sharing. However, even if we were to build this in an extension, from looking at re and ftx, it seems like we'd still need mk_foreign_func'ed functions, at least one of which would still need to use scheme_call. Do you know of another way to assign arguments to and evaluate a closure passed to a foreign function from tinyscheme? Do you know if Jonathan Shapiro/Dimitrios Souflis are still actively maintaining tinyscheme? > I plan on enabling the loading of extensions at run-time at some point. The > main reason it hasn't been turned on yet is that I do not know whether the > code that loads extensions is portable to other operating systems. Looking forward to it! Thanks! Ted Cooper and Emily Jacobson _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
