Sven Neumann schreef: > Hi, > > On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 14:53 +0200, gg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> Does your reply indicate you take a "this feature not a bug" approach here >> and you think is the best way gimp should deal with this situation? > > Indeed. When you open a JPEG file, then you have a decoded image. The > settings that were used to encode it are irrelevant since encoding it > again as a JPEG file would not yield the same image anyway. Thus it is > better to use the default values. Since we will very soon allow the user > to change these defaults, this should be the best way we can handle > this. Perhaps not a bug, but IMHO gimp's JPEG handling violates the principle of least surprise. I had a quick look at the source code and found out that the quality setting (and other parameters) are saved in a global variable jsvals, which is initialized with the default values (85 for the quality), but gets overwritten after "save as": 1. open a.jpg 2. save a.jpg -> a.jpg is saved with the default quality, 85. Fine by me. 3. save a.jpg with "save as", with quality say 55 -> as expected it is saved with quality 55. 4. open b.jpg 5. save b.jpg -> b.jpg is saved with quality 55 instead of 85!! Wouldn't it be better if gimp acted in one of those two ways: 1. always save with the default quality, except when "save as" is used. 2. read the quality when loading a jpeg, and used that to save the image (if "save as" is not used). -- If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood on the shoulders of giants. -- Isaac Newton Roel Schroeven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
