On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 20:08 +0100, Michael Natterer wrote: > I don't remember the actual math involved and didn't try to follow > your elaborate code path description. When I implemented this it > was pretty clear from the beginning that -100% 'L' would have to > make the image all black and +100% 'L' all white, and all values > in between would be linear interpolations. That's how it was > implemented in the end. > > No voodoo involved :-) > > The only point potentially open for discussion would be what > the proper word for 'L' is. I think Lightness is fine from an end user perspective. The docs need to be updated to reflect the real meaning behind the slider (and it's name - the docs call it "Value" at the moment). The reason this came up at all was that someone asked what units were associated with those sliders, which led me to ask what the real meaning was for each slider. Now I know. :-) I've got a minor patch for the english version of the online docs. I'll submit it to the gimp-docs mailing list. Thanks. -- Michael J. Hammel Senior Software Engineer mjhammel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://graphics-muse.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ His men would follow him anywhere, ... but only out of morbid curiosity. -- From a real employee performance evaluation. _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer