Hi, jimmac@xxxxxxxxxx (2006-10-17 at 1532.58 +0200): > I also believe that we should allow scaling bitmap brushes. It's easier > to understand why my brush is blurry than why some brushes behave > differently. Does having the brushes at a larger resolution, say > 256x256px, and scaling them down have considerable speed implications? Gimp already does it, just use a pressure sensitive device and activate Size, so you would get a range from original to small and it does not seem to be slow. OTOH, some find the current method or its parameters a bit low quality. Control of size is more an interface issue, just provide a control to go from original down to near zero (remember subpixel methods). Complain about speed vs quality: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170250 Basic idea: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65030 And dupish (just adds rotation): http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163057 Full control system for all paint tools: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119240 GSR _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
