Carol Spears wrote: > the letter has been deleted from the reply. maybe you could paste the > email and be real clear about what i am missing. http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg11413.html > it is less than participating in a real exchange. it screws up > threading. Is that my problem, or yours? I change the subject line usually - didn't this time, since the subject was the digest. > i believe that if you look at the letter i wrote again, you will see > that i am asking nicely and with a little bit of humor that you work > with a little more honesty. I missed that. So can you clarify, please, in what sense I'm being dishonest? Also, if you could be very precise and explain to me why you think that I am somehow making GNOME eat Wilber, that would be helpful. > how could this be aggressive? So - for clarification for my little brain: you're calling me dishonest, incompetent, you're implying that somehow I'm stealing GIMP money (if that's not the case, please explain what you mean by Carol said: > in fact, perhaps jimmac can find the time to make a tee shirt that > states that wilber is dead. gnome can just steal gimps money and get it > over with. ) Now, in the light of all that, can you explain to me how that's not aggressive? Cheers, Dave. -- David Neary bolsh@xxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
