Hi, "Gerald Friedland" <fractor@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> and why you cannot do that by selecting the relevant parts >> and filling this selection? I am having problems to see the problem >> that you are trying to address here. > > True. As long as you have got an appropiate selection too, you could > select the object, fill it, and you are done. A "natural" bucket fill > would just be a short cut to this process. Do we really need the overhead in code and complexity to achieve something that can be easily done in two steps? I think that using the selection tools followed by a fill is the natural way to achieve the desired effect and it is also a lot more flexible than a dedicated tool. If someone wants to put effort into a specialised tool, maybe it could be a red-eye-removal tool because that is really an often requested feature and it is not easily achievable using a combination of the existing tools. Sven _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
