Hi, Akkana Peck <akkana@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > It's a bummer that it's not something like UTF-8 (and quite odd, > if the spec came from Japan), but editing ASCII is still useful > for quite a large number of people. It would require unreasonable effort to create an entry that restricts editing to ASCII and for almost all languages it would be rather useless also. We should restrict ourselves to only displaying these fields. Sven
