On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 06:57:56PM +0200, Rapha?l Quinet wrote: > > One way to solve this would be to put many plug-ins in a gimp-plug-ins > module in gnomecvs, but that would only shift the goal for the plug-in > developers from being included in the main tree to being included in the > "official" list of plug-ins. Maybe that's better than the current > situation? > the people with permissions on gnomecvs have proven (at least to me) to have permission yet not have gimp's interest in their plans. i had problems with gnomecvs, big problems. anyone who got their permission can destroy a project. and it can be difficult to get permissions for people who have gimps best interests in mind. i consider gnomecvs to be a liability and a vulnerability -- not an asset. carol
