I was very thankful for Greg writing somethink like I self could have written (allthough with less good and nice wording), therfor I want to show some support. On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 07:41:49AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote: > > i took on a project that no one wanted to do for the gimp. everyone > whose opinions i was representing near to the end of this project were > more important to me than the one or two people who destroyed it. > > my project was destroyed (the gimp web site for the users) by a man > making decisions about what information users need who has, to the best > of my knowledge, not even on the gimp-user mail list. I don't see the connection to your recent posts. What gives you the right to write such negative, troublemaking, prtly irrational posts (that are extremely hard to parse btw) on a public list? And you wrote about protecting some people. I wonder who's going to protect people from you? > perhaps if you reseached the issues, asked some of the original > developers what the deal is you would write something both unpleasant > and factual about me. Most people wnat to be understood (even by broader audience). But you require research? > until then, you are being unpleasant and unfactual. Unpleasant and in some way even unfactual was limited to posts from you Carol, IMHO. --- Thorsten Wilms
