On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 08:04:04PM +0200, David Neary wrote: > > (we use their toolkit and > infrastructure, a few years ago they used to use our toolkit), did the name change? as far as i know it is still the gimp tool kit. some of you have children. can you imagine asking them for money? i was quite embarrassed for gnome when i saw how the elections worked on the irc. i know the irc is not really the same as the mail and the official business and such, however -- it was the only view i got at that point. also interesting that the documents i read long ago (when i was looking at a gimp foundation) were in html and therefore easily readible with a web browser. i dont suggest html as the format for the documentation. and about goading people who are looking into things now. as much as it might behoove someone to think that i am trying to make life difficult for them, or whatever -- please do not confuse my comments about micro$oft binary text files with goading. you can suggest that i was sucking up to marc lehmann, and that would be perfectly true. also interesting that i am the person goading and not the developer who made the original statement -- but whatever. if you do make the documentation in html, perhaps you could allow Rapha?l to make it readible in netscape for you like he did for the whole gimp-user community. maybe dsrogers could use Rapha?l's help with this? carol
