Hi, "J. Grant" <jg-lists@xxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > Another argument is that we would certainly not want to drop the > >> > current user interface since it works well for a lot of people. So > >> I seriously doubt that any user would object against having WiW in > >> the preferences. > > That's not my point. But adding WiW to the GIMP code will almost > > certainly add a level of complexity to to the user interface code. Let > > alone the fact that noone has yet come up with a proposal on how > > plug-in dialogs should be handled. > > IMHO, the plugins could be left un-bound to any window as they are atm. > Or is there a hard coded underlying attachment between the plugin and > parent windows required for it all to work? Are you saying that plug-in dialogs should be handled differently than core dialogs? If we want to implement WiW, then plug-in dialogs need IMO be embedded into the container windows just like any other GIMP dialog. Sven