Hi, On Mon, 2004-04-05 at 22:28, David Neary wrote: > Up until earlier today there were over 30 versions of the GIMP to > choose from in Bugzilla. This has been reduced to 4 - 1.0.x, 1.2.x, > 1.3.x, 2.0.0 and Current CVS. I question whether we'll need > 2.0.1, 2.0.2, etc at all, and personally I'm happy having just > ".x" for the major branches, but anyway... I think we should stick to having 2.0.1, 2.0.2 etc. It's often important to know if the user reporting a bug is using a particular release in which the bug is supposed to have been fixed. > So - I just wanted to say a big thank you to Luis Villa for doing > this today with his magic SQL fingers. I second that. Thanks Luis - and thank you Dave for taking the initiative to clean this up. > We also talked about the problem of dead/completed milestones - > it doesn't make sense to have any bugs on 1.2.x milestones or > 1.3.x milestones any more (or, indeed, 2.0.0). But it doesn't > make sense to delete them either. True. > Unfortunately, Bugzilla doesn't (yet) have the concept of a completed > milestone, allowing milestones to be hidden from the list for people > doing triage. We can, however, sort these so that the active > milestones are at the top of the list. Does this sound like a good > idea? I think we should stick to a numerically sorted list as I find this more intuitive. When using non-numerically (or non-alphabetically for that matter) sorted list I often find myself looking for an entry in the wrong place... Sincerely, Brix -- Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@xxxxxxxx>
