Manish Singh <yosh@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote: >> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote: >> > > What requirements would the new PDB have? >> > >> > There's a number of issues to be addressed, like GEGL node support, >> > efficiency, UI generation, distributed processing, and macro recording >> > support. >> >> Macro recording is already trivial with libpdb: you just connect to the >> appropriate signal of the Pdb object. > > Have you given any thought on how to macroize interactive paint > functions? By simply passing an array of GimpCoords to the yet-to-be-generated core PDB wrappers, just as all core functions will have to be invoked via these wrappers to make marco recording possible. ciao, --mitch
