On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote: > Hi, > > Manish Singh wrote: > > A PDB revamp is planned. > > How far along is the planning? I have heard of Rock's libpdb, > which I believe he wants to finish for 2.2, but I hadn't heard > any concrete plans for the often-mentioned forthcoming PDB > re-write. There hasn't been any real planning, other than planning to do some planning after 2.0 is out. All I was saying is that we haven't forgot about it. > What requirements would the new PDB have? Not clear yet. I don't think we should really touch the PDB for 2.2, if we want to do a short release cycle for that. There's a number of issues to be addressed, like GEGL node support, efficiency, UI generation, distributed processing, and macro recording support. -Yosh
