Re: [Gimp-developer] Some more open issues for 2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Tim Mooney <mooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> >- gimp.spec should not be in the tarball
> 
> Why not?

Because our experience in the pre-releases has shown that it is
extremely difficult to provide a working spec file. And even if we
managed to provide on, it would be specific for a particular
distribution. So we should either provide spec files for all major
distributions as well as portsfiles for the various BSD flavours and
rules to build Debian packages and a configuration file for a Win32
installer or no such file at all. We decided for the second option.


Sven

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux