On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:22:57AM +0100, Simon Budig wrote: > [restricting this to gimp-devel, since this is purely technical stuff] > > GSR - FR (famrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > Simon.Budig@xxxxxxxxxxx (2004-01-19 at 1524.44 +0100): > > > [technical discussion :)] > > > I think I already explained why I prefer the set of ratios based on > > > the idea of "homogenous zooming". So the rest of this Mail focuses > > > on the technical issues of your patch. > > > > The last patch I sent does homogenous zooming, has no more (known) > > floating issues (I am not gonna bet about floats, what is more, not > > gonna bet about Gimp either, I saw some warnings about aliasing in > > other parts, and I already had enough with C guts) and is small, it > > just fits in place with the old code instead of more deep changes. > > True. (These "break strict aliasing rules" warnings however are harmless > according to Yosh.) Well, not all are harmless. Just that a lot of them are spurious, but some of them do signify real problems. It's a mess. -Yosh
