On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 02:22:03PM +0100, Mukund wrote: > | > Subversion (http://subversion.tigris.org/) implements a versioned FS > | > using a Sleepycat's Berkeley DB database. It has a full library > | > implementation which any application could use. > | > | Well, using a database as container might be a good idea. I'm not quite > | familiar with Berkeley DB but it might be useful as a backend. > > Subversion provides its own client library for accessing the virtual file > system. You won't have to work with the DB directly. It also provides an > abstracted recover facility in one of its utilities (in case of stale locks). But we might want to access the DB directly, e.g. for shared memory. > The whole Subversion thing was a far fetched *idea*. An alternative, > which is most definitely going to be blown off as there are more > reasonable ways of implementing the GIMP file format which are not far > fetched. Hmmm.. it would be cool to have the Undo Stack saved, so I can _really_ continue where I left off when I saved the image. Bye, Tino. -- * LINUX - Where do you want to be tomorrow? * http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag/
