Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: new-xcf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 09:45:51AM -0700, Manish Singh <yosh@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Consider the case of a corrupted xcf file. Maybe only 1 layer out of 20 is
> corrupted. With this proposal, a user needs either a special tool to

(in this case, tar and zip would be preferable over ar, as ar tools are
not well-versed at repairing/ignoring corruption, tar/zip tools often are
better prepared).

> which is why I prefer it. zip/jar is especially crappy since the file index
> is at the end, which means it's harder to recover from a partial file.

Actually, zip has all file headers twice: once before the file within
the stream, and another time at the end.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@xxxxxxxx      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux