Hi, "Adam D. Moss" <adam@xxxxxxxx> writes: > I was in the process of moving the code to the following XFree-style > license if that's okay. I don't see the utility in dual-licensing > since either of the above can trivially subsume the proposed license > (apologies for mozilla deciding to kill the formatting): this looks very much like the MIT license which is what I would have suggested to use anyway. The only difference to the MIT license seems to be the last paragraph and it looks like a reasonable addition: > Except as contained in this notice, the name of the Author of the > Software shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote > the sale, use or other dealings in this Software without prior > written authorization from the Author. As far as I am concerned, go for it. Salut, Sven
