On 06 Mar 2003 18:47:12 +0100, Sven Neumann <sven@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] And I replied some silly things... Hmmm... Looks like I misread Sven's message. I thought that you wanted the option of having a license _with_ advertising clause. I did not see the "o" in "w/o". Silly me! So of course there is no need for dual licensing in this case. Forget what I said in my previous message. Doh! -Raphaël
