Re: [Gimp-developer] Re: dependable contributions lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6 Dec 2002, Sven Neumann wrote:
> well, using AUTHORS is probably a bad idea since it is the ASCII-only
> version generated from the file contributors which also has UTF8
> encoded names.

Actually, it reads contributors and not AUTHORS.  It's just your script
that creates AUTHORS, etc, hacked up to generate a web page.

> I'd really like to replace this mess by something saner and I was hoping
> that we could come up with something that also fits the needs of the
> web-site authors.

I'm certainly willing to discuss this.

> If you don't want us to cooperate on this subject, I'll just change the
> files to fit my needs (or rather the needs of the GIMP core hackers) and
> you'll have to do script hacking to get your page done. However I'd
> rather see use a format we have discussed beforehand. If you don't like
> XML as I suggested, perhaps we can come up with something else...

XML is probably overkill, but anything is fine as long as it is easily
parsed.  Our biggest need right now is a latin-1 version of the names with
special charactors.  The web page needs to be in latin-1 because most
web browsers aren't very good with UTF-8.  Right now I'm running recode
manually, and then hand-editing the file because recode seems to chew off
some perfectly normal looking characters from the file.

Perhaps the header/footer text of the web/AUTHORS/*.h files can be
embedded in the contributors file, or, more cleanly, the script would take
two files, one of which is a stylesheet-type thing that the script uses to
create the output file from the contributors file.

Rockwalrus


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux