Hi, "Branko Collin" <collin@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 14 Jun 2002, at 15:19, Nick Lamb wrote: > > > OK, so the big problem is Script-Fu because it's fairly embedded and > > it's somewhat hairy. The ordinary plugins aren't much of a problem, in > > the very worst case they can be removed from the distribution > > temporarily. > > > > Surely the #1 thing someone should be doing (preferably someone who > > actually knows about Script-Fu) is to contact the copyright holders > > for the "obnoxiously licensed" Script-Fu code and ask them very > > politely if they would let us include that code in some GPL software, > > with proper credits of course, but without the unacceptable license > > terms ? > > > > Please someone figure out who to contact, mail them and CC the list. > > I thought the older plan was to put in a whole new Scheme > interpreter. Wouldn't Guile work? That is already GPL'ed. that is still the plan and yes, I consider to use Guile. This won't happen in the 1.2 tree however so it won't fix the problem there. Salut, Sven
