On 14 Jun 2002, at 15:19, Nick Lamb wrote: > OK, so the big problem is Script-Fu because it's fairly embedded and > it's somewhat hairy. The ordinary plugins aren't much of a problem, in > the very worst case they can be removed from the distribution > temporarily. > > Surely the #1 thing someone should be doing (preferably someone who > actually knows about Script-Fu) is to contact the copyright holders > for the "obnoxiously licensed" Script-Fu code and ask them very > politely if they would let us include that code in some GPL software, > with proper credits of course, but without the unacceptable license > terms ? > > Please someone figure out who to contact, mail them and CC the list. I thought the older plan was to put in a whole new Scheme interpreter. Wouldn't Guile work? That is already GPL'ed. -- branko collin collin@xxxxxxxxx
