Tuomas Kuosmanen schrieb: > > For the deeper nested pages like http://www.gimp.org/the_gimp_system_reqs.html > > which are not as often linked I would recommend a redirect. > We should have those most-often-needed pages there, as they are not > going to collide with the new structure (I prefer directories too, makes > stuff more simple to maintain) - The pages would just contain a template > to "this page is moved to [insert new url here]", once there are no hits > to them in the logs anymore, we can remove them. I changed my mind. Why should we remove them? We should integrate all the current links to fit to the new structure. Speak of: 2 links, one page. I dont think that this would be too hard to create such a system. > And I think the best fallback thing to do is to have the "404 Document > not found" -page be a site map: This would be a huge improvement. But then... everythings better than a plain 404. :-)) Christoph -- http://home.bn-paf.de/smokey/
