Re: RFC: The future of The GIMP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jon Winters wrote:
> 
> We should keep in mind that the vast majority of Gimp users are not
> compiling from source.  A shell script is not something those folks
> understand.  Their reaction will be... Heh.. Where are all the plugins,
> this sucks!

Yep. Most users won't read the README either so we need something that
is immediately clear.

> Xtns > Plugins > Update Plugins...
> 
> And some sort of cuddley GUI driven crapplet that compares the users
> plugins to the official plugin FTP archive or one of its mirrors.  Users
> could pick and choose the plugins they would like to upgrade or install
> and have a chance to un-install stuff they don't like.

1 problem. What if the user has no internet connection (hard to imagine
these days, in the USA but also in Europe internet use is now rather
widespread, but still). On the other hand, there _has_ to be a way to
install plugins from source, or everyone who's not on a supported
platform would be stuck.
 
So we need:

1) Simple and straightforward plugin installation from the web for
completely non-technical users (useful anyway, since then we don't have
to wait for distributions to start carrying the latest plugins). Could
be source or binary, but probably source with a standardized building
method. Gimp would have to come with generic makefiles (ie for any
plugin) for each platform.

2) The possibility to pack the plugins into separate packages, so that
they can be included with distributions properly (either source or
binary, that's up to the distribution maintainers). This is for people
installing a distro from CDROM.

That way non-technical users can just pick out gimp in their distro, and
select the plugins they want in their distro menu, and later update from
the web in a straightforward manner. People building from source build
from source and then install the plugins through the applet.
And people who want to build the plugins themselves (plugin developers
for instance) can still do so from the console using the generic
makefile for their platform (which every plugin has to adhere to).

Does anyone see any holes in this one?

Lourens


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux