On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Tim Mooney wrote: > In regard to: Re: TODO for 1.2 release, Garry R. Osgood said (at 5:38am on...: > > >Nick Lamb wrote: > > > >> > >> Enough hilarity. If you know of something which must be done before > >> 1.2.0 please follow on to this mail. If you know of a reason why > >> we should unfreeze Gimp instead, feel free to let loose. > >> > >> 1. VAGUE: Documentation should be "good" (definition anyone?) > >> 2. Critical/ Severe bug reports should be fixed or marked down (bug #s?) > >> 3. VAGUE: Gimp should build out-of-box on lots of systems > >> 99. Find and #ifdef any debug scribble to console > >> 100. Check package files, READMEs, etc. for correctness > >> > > > >??. sigaction/OSF/1/GTK resolution > >Signal messiness. and a temporary hack is (Am I correct on this, Tim Mooney?) > > I was going to send something to the list about this very issue. You are > correct. The resolution was to get plumbing in glib so that it detects > EINTR and returns some distinguishable error in that case for g_io_channels(). > That plumbing hasn't shown up yet. > > I'll send along what I've composed so far... i think austin even had a patch for this, i'd love to include it into glib and release 1.2.9 for gimpers. though, what exact date do you have in mind for 1.2.0? i don't have austin's email handy, so i'd apprechiate if anyone would forward this email. > > Tim --- ciaoTJ
