You wrote on Fre, 25 Aug 2000: >Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2000 01:08:42 +0200 > From: Sven Neumann <neumanns@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > [blurb about #ifdef GIMP_ENABLE_COMPAT_CRUFT] > > Are you sure? Why does it work for the gimp-print plug-in then? > >We've been using the old names. I ran Sven's conversion script to >generate the new names, and put a whole stack of #define's in the one >UI-related file that's shared between the 1.0 code and the 1.2 code. > What about a common header that makes this defines? So a plug-in maintainer can use the new conventions and if the plug-in should be compiled for the old api, this can easily observed by including this header. (Don't know exactly about the under-the-hood complexity of what I'm talking about ;-)) Uwe -- mailto:koloska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://rcswww.urz.tu-dresden.de/~koloska/ -- -- right now the web page is in german only but this will change as time goes by ;-)
