On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 03:30:55PM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> > >Testing autoconf...
> > >expr: syntax error
> > >too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14
> > > [ ... ]
> >
> > Most likely, you have 2.14a or something like that.
>
> Yes I have 2.14a
>
> > I sent a patch
> > to Sven a few days ago that should fix this -- you may want to do
> > a CVS update to see if he's commited it. If not, here's the patch I
> > sent Sven:
> > [ ... ]
>
> This patch was already applied when I first report this buglet.
> It seems that $VER contains more than one line.
> The following patch fixes that problem:
>
[ ... ]
After having tried w/ Autoconf 2.13, it seems that this patch is more
appropriate:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff -Nru gimp.orig/autogen.sh gimp/autogen.sh
--- gimp.orig/autogen.sh Sat Jun 24 02:32:27 2000
+++ gimp/autogen.sh Sun Jun 25 15:21:56 2000
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
echo
echo "Testing autoconf... "
-VER=`autoconf --version | sed "s/.* \([0-9.]*\)[a-z]\?$/\1/"`
+VER=`autoconf --version | head -1 | sed "s/.* \([0-9.]*\)[a-z]\?$/\1/"`
if expr $VER \>= 2.13 >/dev/null; then
echo "looks OK."
else
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regards,
DindinX
--
David.Odin@xxxxxxxxxxx
Author of the French Book: Programmation Linux avec GTK+
"There are some things that even a baby shouldn't fool around with."
-- Tommy, from Angelica The Magnificent
