Re: Wrong test for newer/older version of autoconf in the cvs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 02:26:57PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2000 at 01:39:43AM +0200, David Odin wrote:
> >Testing autoconf...
> >expr: syntax error
> >too old! (Need 2.13, have 2.14
> >  [ ... ]
> 
> Most likely, you have 2.14a or something like that.

  Yes I have 2.14a

> I sent a patch
> to Sven a few days ago that should fix this -- you may want to do
> a CVS update to see if he's commited it. If not, here's the patch I
> sent Sven:
>   [ ... ]

  This patch was already applied when I first report this buglet.
  It seems that $VER contains more than one line.
  The following patch fixes that problem:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff -Nru gimp.orig/autogen.sh gimp/autogen.sh
--- gimp.orig/autogen.sh	Sat Jun 24 02:32:27 2000
+++ gimp/autogen.sh	Sun Jun 25 15:21:56 2000
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 echo
 
 echo "Testing autoconf... "
-VER=`autoconf --version | sed "s/.* \([0-9.]*\)[a-z]\?$/\1/"`
+VER=`autoconf --version | grep autoconf | sed "s/.* \([0-9.]*\)[a-z]\?$/\1/"`
 if expr $VER \>= 2.13 >/dev/null; then
 	echo "looks OK."
 else
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


            Regards,

                              DindinX

-- 
David.Odin@xxxxxxxxxxx


Author of the French Book: Programmation Linux avec GTK+

	"My husband commits an inconceivable act of perversion with a
barnyard animal, and it's not central to my case?!"
	"Not in California."


[Index of Archives]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [GIMP for Windows]     [KDE]     [GEGL]     [Gimp's Home]     [Gimp on GUI]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux