On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 12:38:45PM +0100, Nick Lamb wrote: > I suspect that choosing a non-integer implementation (which might be > faster on modern Intel hardware) would increase the damage from > subsequent cycles, but I've never tested that. Have now, it makes no difference, so that's another factor eliminated. In fact, the integer code seems to produce the same image data as the float code, unless Gimp's JPEG UI doesn't work how I think it does. Nick.
