On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 02:10:33AM +0000, Nick Lamb <njl98r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "duplicate the palette file parser" rather overstates the problem, if
You picked probably the least important problem :(
> Then you open a dialog which says 'Sorry about this old chap, but
> I'm afraid you'll have to click "Refresh" in the poorly designed
> Palette Edit dialog, we promise to make this less evil in a future
> incarnation of the Gimp'. All done.
Yes, thats not "easy to do", its more like "broken by design".
> I happen to think that the above is better than admitting defeat and
> saying "We can't do that AT ALL".
We still can't do that from a plug-in, there is no point in arguing about
that.
> hacking exercise to (you will accept it if they write it Marc, right?)
With accept you mean "put into the distribution"? I surely have accepted
much worse hackery in the past ;->
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
