On Sun, Jan 30, 2000 at 12:10:16AM +0100, Marc Lehmann wrote: > Probably "You cannot read/modify/list/do anything with the colormaps in > the gimp." Well, the mail I replied to (from Kelly I think) talked about indexed palettes or colourmaps or somesuch, and the word indexed to me means the kind applied to INDEXED images. So I explained how to get at them from the PDB, but there's a much EASIER way for the other kind. Gimp palettes are files :) > If you have ever asked yourself why the "Smooth colour palette"-plug-in > outputs an image and not a colormap, than you now know why. I just assumed someone thought it was better that way. You can open, examine, edit and save the Gimp's palette files, I do not know what this particular application is, but I should think that it would need to be a Gimp plug-in only because it's convenient to invoke it from the Gimp. The palette files are of a simple, easily parsed format and compatability with other similar formats is trivial to arrange if it seems appropriate. Hey - This might be perfect for a Perl plug-in, since it does text munging and should preferably be written without breaking the feature freeze - no? > I hope somebody will find it critical enough to implement the PDB > interface ;) We shouldn't add more PDB interfaces to 1.1.x unless they fix a bug fopen() works here. I think Gimp 1.0.x shipped with a plug-in I wrote that took just this approach(*). The only thing missing then was a good PDB interface to refresh the palette lists, if that still doesn't exist it would be a good first patch for 1.3.x -- unlike INDEXED the ordinary palettes will probably still be a good idea in 2001 :) Nick. (*) That plug-in is now gone not because it didn't work, but because its functionality belonged in the core, where I eventually put it.