On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 03:10:30PM +0100, Simon Budig <Simon.Budig@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Paul Melis (melis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > I suggest the following generalisation: > > a thingy (for lack of a good name) which: > > Every image can then have a set of thingies associated While this _is_ interesting for some uses, for most people this would be a large hindrance (I would dislike being forced to switch to paintbrush for _every_ image I have loaded in turn to draw to them). Making that a preferences item won't help, either. > This has been adressed in the context-system. Michael Natterer > did work on this. I dont know the current state, but it probably > wont come into 1.2. The context stuff will be in 1.2, although in somewhat crippled form. -- -----==- | ----==-- _ | ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +-- --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |e| -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+ The choice of a GNU generation | |