On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 03:10:30PM +0100, Simon Budig <Simon.Budig@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Paul Melis (melis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > I suggest the following generalisation:
> > a thingy (for lack of a good name) which:
> > Every image can then have a set of thingies associated
While this _is_ interesting for some uses, for most people this would be a
large hindrance (I would dislike being forced to switch to paintbrush for
_every_ image I have loaded in turn to draw to them).
Making that a preferences item won't help, either.
> This has been adressed in the context-system. Michael Natterer
> did work on this. I dont know the current state, but it probably
> wont come into 1.2.
The context stuff will be in 1.2, although in somewhat crippled form.
--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|
