On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote: > I think that the gimp doc web page is a bit misleading. > > I think that the pages should be arranged in this way: > > docs.gimp.org/xx/v.v.v/index.html > ^^ ^^^^^ > language version > code code > > and the always developing code trunk should be published in this way: > > docs.gimp.org/xx/index.html > > In this way we could easily compare the different versions and make the > online user always use the most updated version. > > So the "Work in progress" HTML link anchors should point in the latter > form and not (as it is now) to a specific version (2.8). > > This is a kind of "RFC" :-) please say what you think about it. > PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read as: docs.gimp.org/v.v.v/xx/index.html -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ _______________________________________________ gimp-docs-list mailing list gimp-docs-list@xxxxxxxxx https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs-list
