On 12/19/09, Ulf-D. Ehlert wrote: > Using the branch after releasing html packages doesn't make any sense > to me. Really? :) Let's see. We have a stable 2.6 version of GIMP and unstable 2.7 that will become v2.8. So we are dealing with two branches to document. In case we are going to release docs for 2.8 around actual 2.8 release, how on Earth are we supposed to provide updates for 2.6 all this time if not by working on two branches? :) Of course, if we are not going to release updates for 2.6 or if we are going to start work on for 2.8 *after* 2.8 release, that's a whole different situation :) Alexandre _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
