On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:16:48AM +0200, Axel Wernicke wrote: > Hi Marco, > > the magic word here is transparency. These graphics have to be redone for 2.4 > anyways, so I think this is a good chance to make the manual independant of the > background color. It doesn't matter whether we talk about a red, gray or brown > background - the graphics should not contain any background color. > So, I'd suggest we stick to the dark background for now, because it is the only > way to see where the problems are. Hiding them is not a solution. I would agree with you in terms of the transparence background, but that would raise some problems with the 'numbers' pointing to specific regions. Those are currently black and white. Having a transparent background means, that those numbers are not very well visible by the people. Having a well defined background color (like white) means, that we don't have to care of layout changes :) Greetings, -- Roman Joost www: http://www.romanofski.de email: romanofski@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
