On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:34:21AM +0100, Roman Joost wrote: > Hi Marco, > > On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 11:13:52AM +0100, Marco Ciampa wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 10:05:06PM +0100, Roman Joost wrote: > > >New Release cycle > > > > > >I propose, that releases were made on fixed dates: every two months. > > > > It could be even a bit more "relaxed" cycle (of three or four months or so) > > but there is the need to fix the date to "freeze" or to check for errors in > > a more sistematic way. > Actually I first thought about every month, because of bunch of changes > the manual last months had. The last release was in April, which is far > too old. But that is my fault. > > So, lets say a release every three months on a fixed date (like first > day in the month) would be okey? ok so: 01/01 - 01/04 - 01/07 - 01/10 ? > > How about doing like ubuntu? i. e. gimp-help version 0.x.[00|04|08] > Hm.. I'd like to stick on our versioning scheme. no problem, it's just a label. -- Marco Ciampa +--------------------+ | Linux User #78271 | | FSFE fellow #364 | +--------------------+ _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
