Are you sure?
"1/" was the example given by Roman and used in toolbox/intro.xml or
tool-rect-select.xml for instance: working well.
Another way to ask my question: must we have only one revnumber for the
file (and for all languages) or a revnumber for every language in the file?
Julien
Axel Wernicke a écrit :
Hi,
Am 11.03.2006 um 08:33 schrieb julien:
I don't well understand <revision>
Should it be:
1/ <revision>
<revnumber>$revision:$</revnumber>
<date lang="en">...
<authorinitials lang="en">...
<date lang="fr">...
<authorinitials lang="fr">...
</revision>
with only one revnumber for the file,
or
2/ <revision lang="en">
<revnumber>$revision:$</revnumber>
<date>...
<authorinitials>...
</revision>
<revision lang="fr">
<revnumber>$revision:$</revnumber>
<date>...
<authorinitials>...
</revision>
with a revnumber for every language in the file?
The first version is simply not valid docbook xml. Thats why it can't be
used.
lexa
julien
_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
---
Live is like a chocolate box, you never know what you wanna get...
GPG Signatur auf http://wernicke-online.net/Impressum/ prüfen
_______________________________________________
Gimp-docs mailing list
Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
