Hi, Am 11.03.2006 um 08:33 schrieb julien:
I don't well understand <revision>
Should it be:
1/ <revision>
<revnumber>$revision:$</revnumber>
<date lang="en">...
<authorinitials lang="en">...
<date lang="fr">...
<authorinitials lang="fr">...
</revision>
with only one revnumber for the file,
or
2/ <revision lang="en">
<revnumber>$revision:$</revnumber>
<date>...
<authorinitials>...
</revision>
<revision lang="fr">
<revnumber>$revision:$</revnumber>
<date>...
<authorinitials>...
</revision>
with a revnumber for every language in the file?
The first version is simply not valid docbook xml. Thats why it can't be used.
lexa
julien _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
--- Live is like a chocolate box, you never know what you wanna get... GPG Signatur auf http://wernicke-online.net/Impressum/ prüfen
Attachment:
PGP.sig
Description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht
_______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
