On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, Axel Wernicke wrote: > I wrote: > >> hmm, it should be 2.0.9 too! Pretty sure it is! > > > > No, it doesn't look like the HTML version. The date is 2004 and > > there is only a "What¿s New in The Gimp 2.0?" section. There is > > no "What¿s New in The Gimp 2.2?" section. > > Hmm, Roman - we need to do something about this - should I start > trying to get that cow flying? Nice turn of phrase! I think I'll be able to use that one. > Well it's not that bad - creating the html version is pretty > straight forward. May be we should consider building a one file > html as long as the pdf is out of order ... ... um, the gimp > manual is up to 450 pages in around 7 (en;de;cs;nl;fr;sv;zh_CN) > languages. A team of around a dozen people is working on it - > thats nothing you want to do in OO ! I figured as much. Is it possible to produce a single DocBook file? And can that file be loaded by OpenOffice long enough to do the transform? Perhaps I can just do an end-run around the problem. > But we could need some help with it everytime - so if you have > questions or annotations to the manual - please ask and state > them ! Thanks very much for your help gentlemen. I'm looking forward to curling up with a nice fat book over the holidays. Regards, Keith Hanlan Ottawa, Canada _______________________________________________ Gimp-docs mailing list Gimp-docs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-docs
