2011/6/13 Øyvind Kolås <pippin@xxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Martin Nordholts <enselic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> First of all, I think the name should be gegl-ui, not gegl-gtk, in >> case we want to provide a widget for say Qt. >> >> I support moving the UI stuff into a separate git repository; it will >> be nice to have separate commit histories. > > Having a library that depends on a lot of different UI frameworks > might not be conductive to encourage adoption. Since this would mean > that in distributions you would be pulling in the packages for all the > possible dependencies when wanting only one of them. > > There is already a Clutter based GEGL integration library, and to me > it makes sense for there to be separate ones for different ui > toolkits. > > http://git.clutter-project.org/clutter-gegl/ It would be separate libraries, just a common git repository. But I've changed my mind, it probably makes most sense to have one git repo per target toolkit anyway and call the GTK one gegl-gtk. / Martin -- My GIMP Blog: http://www.chromecode.com/ "GIMP 2.8 schedule on tasktaste.com" _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
