Nicolas Robidoux wrote: > A side effect of this choice is that if one downsamples with one and > upsamples with the other, the resulting image will not be aligned with > the original. (Of course, if one uses the same resampler for both, the > results will be aligned, unless the calling routine (e.g., scale) > messes things up, which I think it won't.) > I don't like very much that repeated up-and-down-scaling of the image can offset the image, to me this sounds like a rather severe instability. On the other hand, for high quality "one-way" resampling it might be a price worth paying. And with image processing with GEGL being non-destructive this is perhaps not that big of an issue. Is it a lot of work to change convention in a resampler afterwards? Would it be possible to parameterize this so you could even toggle pixel-center convention during runtime? / Martin _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
