Christopher Montgomery writes: > ... > Ah, you mean that the implementation is easier, not that the output > results differ? > ... Christopher: Can we start from scratch? I'm afraid that we may take a long time explaining to each other exactly what we mean, with the most likely end result that we agree with each other on the essential (code-wise consequences). I started the ball rolling being vague, let me see if I can stop it. It's not that I don't welcome your input (I actually sought it, and it is important to me that we align the GEGL resampler team with their GIMP counterparts), it is just that I am too tired/busy to get into a "I actually mean this, which really is the same although it is different from what you mean, is that right? Oh! you were talking about this limited situation but I was talking about the more general one and things are not the same but you can emulate the other if you are willing to blah blah blah" debate. It's more important to me to be useful than to be right. nicolas _______________________________________________ Gegl-developer mailing list Gegl-developer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gegl-developer
